There is an unsaved comment in progress. You will lose your changes if you continue. Are you sure you want to reopen the work item?
Is CSLA 3.6 CodeSmith generation dormient or missing types?
Shouldn't there be a few more stereo type templates for CodeSmith? I don't see switchable, command or name value list. Has CSLA Contrib work gone to sleep on creating CodeSmith templates using CSLA 3.6 objects? I appreciate all the work that "RickySupit" has already done. I hope my message here is not offending anyone or the dismissing the hard work that has already been accomplished.
I have seen that Code Smith 5.1 has a developer redoing all the CSLA 3.6 templates in the paid version of CodeSmith. I think the community here has a lot experience that shouldn't be lost.