Is CSLA 3.6 CodeSmith generation dormient or missing types?
description
Shouldn't there be a few more stereo type templates for CodeSmith? I don't see switchable, command or name value list. Has CSLA Contrib work gone to sleep on creating CodeSmith templates using CSLA 3.6 objects? I appreciate all the work that "RickySupit" has already done. I hope my message here is not offending anyone or the dismissing the hard work that has already been accomplished.
I have seen that Code Smith 5.1 has a developer redoing all the CSLA 3.6 templates in the paid version of CodeSmith. I think the community here has a lot experience that shouldn't be lost.